infra:bgpwtf:new-edge-router
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| infra:bgpwtf:new-edge-router [2025/03/31 14:11] – [Rejects] q3k | infra:bgpwtf:new-edge-router [2025/05/29 13:28] (current) – q3k | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| - Rack mount, ideally 1U | - Rack mount, ideally 1U | ||
| + | - Either a PC (for NixOS) with IPMI or a proper router that won't need to be remote rescued | ||
| + | - If not a PC must be able to do v4/v6 routing and do BGP/ | ||
| - Front facing ports | - Front facing ports | ||
| - | - Either built-in or expandable to 4xGbE and 2xSFP+ (eg. for a PC a PCIe slot for a ConnectX-6) | + | - Either built-in or expandable to 4xGbE and 2xSFP+ (eg. for a PC a PCIe slot for a ConnectX-6 |
| - Not a power hog (ie. not an ancient Xeon server) | - Not a power hog (ie. not an ancient Xeon server) | ||
| - | - Either a PC with IPMI or a proper router that won't need to be remote rescued | ||
| ===== Candidates ===== | ===== Candidates ===== | ||
| - | - A Mikrotik CCR2004 ; if no better options appear by EOM April q3k will just buy one | + | - A Mikrotik CCR2004 ; if no better options appear by EOM April q3k will just buy one. It's not a proper router but it's fucking something. And it's certainly better than the courent zombie mode edge01. |
| + | - **Juniper NFX250 / MX150: our pick for edge02** | ||
| ===== Rejects ===== | ===== Rejects ===== | ||
| - Supermicro offer: seemingly not updated for edge/ | - Supermicro offer: seemingly not updated for edge/ | ||
| + | - The only attractive machine is the [[https:// | ||
| - ASRock Rack offer: nothing compact | - ASRock Rack offer: nothing compact | ||
| - Lanner offer: 'call us for quote' | - Lanner offer: 'call us for quote' | ||
infra/bgpwtf/new-edge-router.1743430265.txt.gz · Last modified: by q3k